Corporate Governance -
What Happened When India Mandated Gender Diversity on Boards - Sun and Planets Spirituality AYINRIN
From The Palace Of Kabiesi Ebo Afin!Ebo Afin Kabiesi! His Magnificence Oloja Elejio Oba Olofin Pele Joshua Obasa De Medici Osangangan broad-daylight natural blood line 100% Royalty The God, LLB Hons, BL, Warlord, Bonafide King of Ile Ife kingdom and Bonafide King of Ijero Kingdom, Number 1 Sun worshiper in the Whole World.I'm His Magnificence the Crown.
For Spiritual Consultations, Spiritual divination reading, Guidance and Counseling, spiritual products and spiritual Services, offering of Spiritual Declarations , call or text Palace and Temple Phone and Whatsapp contact: +2348166343145, Phone And WhatsApp Contact : +2347019686274 ,Mail: obanifa87@gmail.com, Facebook page: Sun Spirituality.
Website:www.sunspirituality.com.
Our Sun spiritual Temple deliver Spiritual Services to Companies owners, CEOs, Business brands owners, Bankers, Technologists, Monarchs, Military officers, Entrepreneurs, Top Hierarchy State Politicians, and any Public figures across the planet.
Author:His Magnificence the Crown, Kabiesi Ebo Afin! Oloja Elejio Oba Olofin Pele Joshua Obasa De Medici Osangangan Broadaylight.
Summary.
In recent research on diversity quotas in India, one of the first instances of an emerging market adopting gender quotas, the authors found that firms’ gender quotas represented a step in the right direction but did not go far enough. Firms which, at face value, seemed to be complying with gender quotas by appointing women on merit from outside the organization still “buffer” their existing activities through selective committee appointments, relegating the new female quota fillers to less consequential committees. For gender quotas to achieve their purpose as an internal corporate governance mechanism, corporate boards must embrace the appointment of well-qualified women who bring a valuable perspective to the board.
Gender quotas on corporate boards have emerged as a popular tool for policymakers to promote gender equality in the workplace. The movement began in 2003 when Norway instituted a 40 percent quota for women on its country’s corporate boards. Spain, Finland, Iceland, France, Israel, Kenya, Italy, Belgium, Portugal, Germany, and Austria have followed suit with their own quotas. In March 2020, the European Commission announced it would attempt to reach a gender balance of 50 percent within its own management structure by the end of 2024. In 2018, California became the first U.S. state to mandate gender quotas for publicly traded companies incorporated in the state or risk facing heavy fines. But do these top-level initiatives produce substantive change, or are they merely symbolic?
In
recent research, we examined the effects of board diversity quotas in
India, one of the first instances of an emerging market adopting gender
quotas to promote diversity. Given longstanding societal norms deterring
the advancement of women in the workplace, we sought to understand
whether Indian firms would respond to gender quotas in a superficial
manner. We found that firms’ gender quotas represented a step in the
right direction but did not go far enough.
Quota fillers or contributing members?
The 2018 California mandate was met with claims
that new female board members wouldn’t be selected on merit, but simply
to fulfill the mandatory quota. This belief, along with accusations
that the practice of appointing “insiders” (female relatives of the
controlling owner or female executives of the firm) is rife, suggest
that while the appointment of women complies with quota requirements,
their presence may not be seen as legitimate. For gender quotas to
achieve their purpose as an internal corporate governance mechanism,
they must embrace the appointment of well-qualified women who bring a
valuable perspective to the board. The
prospect of symbolic actions in board appointments is particularly
salient in emerging markets with lower corporate transparency, weak
institutions, and less progressive societal attitudes towards gender
equality. India is one such emerging market to embrace gender quotas:
the 2013 Companies Act made it compulsory for all publicly listed firms to have at least one woman director. We
examined the compliance choices of NIFTY 500 firms from 2013 — the top
500 firms ranked by market capitalization on India’s National Stock
Exchange (NSE). Of these firms, 303 firms (60.6%) had no women on their
board in 2013 and needed to appoint at least one female director by
April 1, 2015. The boards of these 303 firms consisted of 3,320
directors between 2013 and 2017, whose profiles we individually
constructed from corporate filings, press releases, and online sources.
By 2017, 82.8% of previously non-compliant firms appointed a single
woman to their board, while 13.6% of these firms had appointed two or
more women to the board.
We found that unlike the effects of the original Norwegian quota, where a small group of prominent women became directors on multiple boards in the so-called “golden-skirt phenomenon”
(in many cases on a non-executive basis), India’s 2013 Companies Act
was successful in significantly enlarging the pool of distinct women
serving as directors. Contrary
to our expectations, we found that most boards fulfilled the quota by
appointing female directors who were independent, rather than insiders —
70.4% of women appointed to previously all-male boards were classified
as independent. Yet, while these newly appointed female directors in
Indian boards were also considerably more educated and more likely to
have political experience than their male counterparts, they were also
less likely to be appointed to key board committees such as compensation
or nomination committees. Independent women — those appointed from
outside the firm, with no family or ownership ties — were particularly
less likely to sit on prominent committees, compared to similar male
directors who were also independent. For instance, the probability of an
independent female director serving on the audit committee was nearly
40% lower than it was for an independent male director on the same
board. Firms which, at face value, seem to be complying with gender
quotas by appointing women on merit from outside the organization still
“buffer” their existing activities through selective committee
appointments, relegating the new female quota fillers to less
consequential committees.
This
gender bias in committee memberships continued to exist after our
analysis controlled for the prior board experience of each director.
Interestingly, this effect was significantly greater for independent,
highly experienced female directors — the very directors encouraged by
key external monitors and a visible signal of good governance — than
female directors who were insiders to the firm. By sidelining new
independent female board members from the more influential board
committees, predominantly male boards were able to limit the extent of
actual governance reform in their internal board processes.
Implications for corporate boards
The
visibility of compliance is an important issue for policy makers to
address. We need to recognize the limits of corporate transparency and
acknowledge that many firms — particularly in emerging markets — are
obfuscating the process by over-conforming on the surface, but limiting
substantive change with less visible, harder to track internal
decision-making.
We
also need to understand how these buffering processes are designed and
conducted to achieve the same desired end result for boards, regardless
of the number of women appointed to them. As global governments continue
to move forward with gender equality regulations, we must acknowledge
the importance of accounting for not only independence, but also the
competence of women and their voice on the board through committees. It
is critical to hold firms accountable and enhance the transparency that
allows for regulatory scrutiny and standardized non-financial reporting
standards on human capital and diversity issues.
Armed
with this knowledge, policymakers, active investors, search firms, and
boards can push forward with reforms to reduce gender inequality in the
boardroom and target the symbolic response of firms in future
legislation and board composition.
Was this article helpful? Connect with me.
Follow The SUN (AYINRIN), Follow the light. Be bless. I am His Magnificence, The Crown, Kabiesi Ebo Afin!Ebo Afin Kabiesi! His Magnificence Oloja Elejio Oba Olofin Pele Joshua Obasa De Medici Osangangan broad-daylight natural blood line 100% Royalty The God, LLB Hons, BL, Warlord, Bonafide King of Ile Ife kingdom and Bonafide King of Ijero Kingdom, Number 1 Sun worshiper in the Whole World.I'm His Magnificence the Crown. Follow the light.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.