At
Catalyst, a research and advisory organization committed to advancing
women in business, we track the representation of women in
Fortune 500 corporate officer positions. According to our annual census, women held just 8.7% of
Fortune
500 corporate officer positions in 1995. By 2002, the percentage had
nearly doubled to 15.7%—an increase, yes, though still a very small
number.
To understand the reasons for this slow progress, Catalyst recently surveyed Fortune
1000 CEOs and women executives at the vice president level and above
about the challenges women face in advancing to the highest levels of
corporate leadership. Clearly, the problem isn’t lack of ambition. Less
than one-third of the 120 CEOs (almost all male) and the 705 female
executives who responded consider a lack of desire to advance to senior
levels a barrier to women’s advancement. Of those executive women not
already at the very top, 55% said they aspire to the most senior
leadership levels.
Our
survey did show that executive women and CEOs tend to perceive the
barriers to advancement differently. But on one measure they plainly
agree: Lack of general management or line experience is the primary
obstacle, cited by 79% of women and 90% of CEOs. (See the exhibit
“Barriers to Advancement: The Perception Gap.”) CEOs consistently tell
us that when seeking successors—particularly for chairman and CEO
slots—they look for people with high-level profit-and-loss experience.
ExhibitIndicatorStart
Barriers to Advancement: The Perception Gap The
percentage of respondents who agree or strongly agree that each of the
following is a barrier to women’s advancement to the highest
levels.Female ExecutivesCEOs (mostly male)Percentage Agree/Strongly
Agree1008060402007990774372516858684967356349573151295135504643333030273516311324128Lack
of general management or line experienceExclusion from informal
networksStereotypes about women’s roles and abilitiesFailure of top
leaders to assume accountability for women‘s advancementLack of role
modelsCommitment to personal or family responsibilitiesLack of
mentoringLack of awareness of organizational politicsDifferent
behavioral style from organization’s normLack of opportunities for
visibilityInhospitable corporate cultureLack of opportunities for
challenging assignmentsLack of desire to reach senior levelsNot in
management ranks long enoughIneffective leadership styleLack of skills
to reach senior levelsSexual harassmentExhibitIndicatorEnd
Catalyst’s
2002 census indicates that men still dominate these senior line
positions. Although the number of women corporate officers holding line
positions increased from 20% in 1997 to nearly 30% in 2002, men still
hold nine out of ten of these jobs in the Fortune
500. (See the pie chart “Lagging in Line Positions.”) Thus, in 2003,
the pool from which a CEO might draw successors is overwhelmingly male.
ExhibitIndicatorStart
Lagging in Line Positions In 2002, only a small minority of corporate-officer line positions in the Fortune 500 were held by women.WomenMen9.9%90.1%ExhibitIndicatorEnd
Of
course, many women move into powerful staff positions to meet their
personal career aspirations. However, we believe that many women don’t
rise into senior line positions because they aren’t aware that such
positions are open to them, or if they are, they may be discouraged from
pursuing these roles by colleagues and superiors who don’t feel that
women can perform well in them. Or, they simply aren’t on the slate when
succession decisions are made.
Catalyst’s
recent survey suggests a multitude of individual, cultural, and
organizational factors that executive women feel block their
advancement. And it exposes some of the deep disparities between female
executives’ and CEOs’ perceptions about the barriers to women’s
advancement.
A
clear majority of the female executives surveyed cite numerous
barriers: exclusion from informal networks, stereotyping, lack of
mentoring, shortage of role models, commitment to personal or family
responsibilities, lack of accountability on the part of senior
leadership, and limited opportunities for visibility. CEOs also
acknowledge these obstacles but in many cases seem less convinced of
their significance. CEOs also appear to put substantially more weight
than female executives do on these barriers in particular: women’s
ineffective leadership style and their lack of skills to reach senior
levels. (See again the exhibit “Barriers to Advancement: The Perception
Gap.”) These differences are especially noteworthy because although
three-quarters of the women respondents are within two reporting levels
of the CEO, stereotypes about women’s abilities still persist.
Such
data remind us that the glass-ceiling metaphor, though often used, is
oversimplified. Our studies suggest there are glass walls as
well—lateral barriers that limit women’s job potential almost from the
beginning of their careers. The pipeline no longer seems to be the
primary problem. The main issue appears to be top leadership’s failure
to ensure that women get the profit-and-loss experience that would
qualify them for the most senior positions. About two-thirds of women
and more than half of the CEOs surveyed agree that the failure of senior
leadership to assume accountability for women’s advancement is a key
barrier.
Some
companies stand out in their aggressive and effective efforts to change
business-culture norms and move women into leadership roles. (To see a
list of these Catalyst Award winners, go to www.catalystwomen.org.)
Though these companies have varying strategies, they share a commitment
from the very top. The enlightened CEO builds a strategic vision and
business case for gender diversity, sets concrete goals to meet those
commitments, holds management accountable for achieving diversity goals,
reports on progress, participates visibly in diversity events, and
takes every opportunity to communicate these commitments down through
the ranks. He (and it is still usually he) uses the bully pulpit to its
full advantage. The key to women’s advancement rests squarely with him.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.